Automation Portals
- Automatic Identification
- Design & Simulation
- Digital Factory
- Electrical & Control Panels
- Embedded Automation
- Factory Automation
- Fieldbus Networks
- Flow, Level & Process Inst.
- Fluid Power, Valves & Pumps
- HMI & Operator Interfaces
- Industrial Communications
- Industrial Computers
- Industrial I/O
- Machine Control
- Machine Safety
- Manufacturing Intelligence
- Motion Control
- OPC
- Plant Management & Maint.
- PLCopen
- Process Control
- Process Safety
- Programmable Controllers
- Robots & Robot Controllers
- SCADA & RTU
- Security
- Sensors
- Systems Integration
- Test, Measurement & LIMS
- Vision
- Wireless Connectivity
- Network Portals
- EtherCAT
- EtherNet/IP
- PROFINET
- Industry Portals
- Building Automation
- Chemical
- Food & Beverage
- Machine Tools, CNC & DNC
- Material Handling
- Oil & Gas
- Packaging
- Pharmaceutical
- Power & Energy
- Transportation (Microsite)
- Water & Wastewater
- Event Portals
- Hannover Messe
- Industrial Automation NA
- ISA Automation Week
Should I ever put an Encoder on the back of a step motor?
By
John Walewander, Compumotor
The
easiest answer to this question is no! In
the past encoders were common on step motor applications and were present in as
a many as 25% of the total step motor axes being used for precise positioning
applications. The reasons they were used in the past are:
Stall
Detection/Peace of Mind
In
the past, an encoder was used to make sure that the step motor has not stalled.
New patented advancements in Compumotor's step motor technology have
allowed the drive to detect a stall without the presence of an encoder.
Peace of mind can be maintained at much lower cost and greater
simplicity.
Position
Maintenance.
In
the past, encoders were used on step motor systems to create a low bandwidth
position loop. In this mode, extra
pulses were sent to the step motor to move to a specific encoder position or to
return to a position if an external force displaced the motor. Today, these
applications are almost always better served by a servo solution. When the cost of the encoder is added to the step motor
system, the cost difference between servo and stepper is greatly diminished.
At the same relative price level, the servo provides better closed loop
performance.
Exception:
Linear Positioning
The one important exception is applications that use linear encoders. There are several application types, such as microscope inspection, that require very high accuracy of the load and a great deal of stability at rest. Most of the time these are solved with a mechanical positioning system using a leadscrew or ballscrew to convert rotary motion to linear motion. When applying a servo in these situations, the controller must be able to close dual position loops because it is impractical to close the primary servo position loop "around" the mechanical system. Step motor systems are perfect for these applications and provide the best application solution at the lowest cost.
Download this article in PDF format.
This
article was provided by Parker Compumotor, written by John
Walewander.
Parker Compumotor is a leader in the motion control industry providing solutions
for factory automation needs. They takes a system approach to
solving your application and build an integrated family of products to match
your needs. For more information, please visit Compumotor's website at: http://www.compumotor.com.