ISA - Change the name to represent the industry
About this time last year I heard about ISA's proposed name change to "International Society of Automation." I remember thinking to myself, "What a great step for the organization!" A new name would give ISA a new identity and help to re-position itself as the (more appropriate) "global automation" entity. Then, while at ISA Expo 2007, I heard the name change was voted down. I couldn't believe it. I was shocked, disappointed and disillusioned. As an outsider (someone not really familiar with the inner workings of ISA), I couldn't understand what happened. Later, it came to my attention that the new name was basically voted down (and I'm paraphrasing) because many long-time members and society delegates couldn't let go of the "Instrumentation" roots.
Another vote on the name change is set to take place during ISA Expo, Ocotber 14-16, 2008. I understand change is very difficult but, in some cases it is also very necessary. This name change is one of those cases. ISA was initially started in 1945 as the Instrument Society of America. According to ISA's History web page, "Industrial instruments, which became widely used during World War II, continued to play an ever-greater role in the expansion of technology after the war. Individuals like Rimbach and others involved in industry saw a need for the sharing of information about instruments on a national basis, as well as for standards and uniformity. The Instrument Society of America addressed that need."
That was 63 years ago. At that time, there were no automated control systems or automation systems - just instruments and people. Back then, the name Instrument Society of America made sense. According to Wikipedia, early minicomputers were used to control industrial processes in the 1960s. The first PLC was documented in 1968. The first DCSs were introduced by Honeywell and Yokogawa in 1975. Today, instruments are just one (necessary) piece of an overall automation system. It all started with instruments, but then manufacturing demanded more. It demanded a controller, software, sensors, and networks. It demanded an integrated automation system. As manufacturing has evolved, so should ISA. That doesn't mean we should forget about ISA's history - after all it was instrumental in the manufacturing landscape (pardon the pun).
A few years ago, ISA changed its name to "The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society" in an attempt to broaden its scope beyond instrumentation and rid itself of the U.S.-centric identity. At that time, ISA began a significant transformation. Since then, the society has made great progress in becoming the voice of the automation profession and setting the standard in automation. ISA has successfully engaged government and universities to help raise awareness of the automation profession. But it still has a long way to go.
What about Globalization? Manufacturers are producing their products all over the world to meet the demands in global economies. If ISA truly wants to be an international society, its name should reflect it. The majority of the automation population is no longer based in the United States - the majority is now outside of the U.S., in Asia, Europe, South America, and elsewhere. With names, perception is often reality. If you call yourself an international organization, it's easier to become an international organization.
The automation industry is in the midst of a global skills shortage and it's only going to get worse. At the age of 41, I'm a youngster in the automation industry. A large percentage of automation professionals are nearing retirement and there are not enough young people entering the field to backfill those open positions. It's crucial that we attract new blood to the industry - quickly. ISA will be instrumental in attracting those young engineers, but they can't do it alone and they can't do it with a 60+ year old philosophy.
Manufacturing has changed drastically in the last 60 years - from the use of instruments to complex, integrated automation systems. If ISA is truly the global society of automation professionals, then its name should reflect its cause. I implore the "powers that be" to stop fighting change and adopt a new vision. So far, I have not read any compelling arguments against this name change. I've read arguments, but nothing gripping enough to resist the change. We exist in a new century, a new economy and a new world. For ISA to thrive or even survive, it's time for a new name!
If you are an automation professional who cares about your profession, I encourage you to contact your Local Sections and express your support for a new global, automation-focused ISA, which begins with this name change. Section presidents and delegates are listed on at the Local Sections page of the ISA web site.
Respond to Rick's blog on My.Automation.com. Membership required to participate.
Read feedback and respond in Automation discussion group on LinkedIn. Membership required to participate.
Read feedback and respond in ISA discussion group on LinkedIn. Membership required to participate.
- Posted in:
- Related Portals:
- Automatic Identification, Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) Software, Building Automation, Machine Safety, Motion Control, Motors & Drives, Process Instruments, Field Devices & IO, Wireless Networks, Electrical & Control Panels, Valves & Pumps, HMI & Operator Interfaces, Industrial Computers, Programmable Controllers, Robots & Robot Controllers, Test, Measurement & LIMS Portal, OPC & OPC UA Interoperability, Cyber Security, Design & Simulation Software, Machine Tools, CNC & DNC, Material Handling, Packaging, Embedded Automation, Power & Energy, Systems Integration, SCADA & RTU, Vision, Sensors & Industrial I/O, Industrial Networks, Process Automation, Factory Automation, Manufacturing Operations Management
Solving Food Manufacturing Labor Shortages Through Robotic Automation
By Maria Ferrante, PMMI
PMMI had a chance to speak about new technologies and trends in automation with Don Wickstrum, president and owner of...
CIA Exploits of IoT Devices: What lessons can we learn?
By Alan Grau, Icon Labs
Recent WikiLeak documents allege that the CIA developed, or sought to develop, or even “borrowed”, cyberattack...
The IoT Impact on Business Models: What Should Manufacturers Do First?
By Bill Lydon, Editor, Automation.com
The availability of many new technologies has provided the building blocks for dramatic changes in the...
Solving the 7 Most Common Tank Gauging Problems to Improve Safety
By Ulf Johannesson, Emerson
Many terminals and tank farms struggle with tank gauging because they use outdated equipment. However, modern tank...
Identifying Cyber Security Pitfalls in Manufacturing
By Jonathan Wilkins, EU Automation
With new strains of ransomware and other vulnerabilities created every week, what should manufacturers look...
ISA and Automation Federation expert Steve Mustard to present at Advanced Design and...
Mustard is featured in an online article—posted by PLASTICSTODAY—that promotes the presentation he will be giving next week at the Advanced...
On Robot to announce expansion into US market at Automate 2017
Officially launching to the North American market at Automate 2017 in April, On Robot’s two-finger RG2 grippers—available in both single and...
Micro-Epsilon's displacement measurement sensors to be used in European telescope project
The European Southern Observatory based in Garching, Germany, is relying on displacement measurement systems from Micro-Epsilon for a project to...
Helukabel announces completion of expanded German production plant
One of the project’s objectives was to consolidate global R&D activities into one location. The engineering center houses additional test and...
Seeq to present with Bristol Myers Squibb and Devon Energy at OSIsoft User Conference
The presentations will speak of the benefits Seeq customers are realizing in the oil & gas, pharmaceutical, chemical, energy, mining, food and...